Parse This

09.30.05

Parse This: Bill Bennett

George W. Bush and Bill Bennett in happier times

Conservative pundits often say mean things, but seldom do they go so far as to say what they really mean.

At rare moments, however, the mask of civility slips off, and the public is offered a glimpse of the ghastly, pock-marked face that lies beneath the smooth surface of the conservative movement.

Then the mask is quickly put back in place, and followed up with countless photo-ops and explanations of what the pundit really meant to say.

That is exactly what happened a few days ago, when former Republican Education Secretary Bill Bennett suggested on his radio show that America would be a safer place if all black babies in this country were aborted. And I quote:

I do know that it’s true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could, if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down. So these far-out, these far-reaching, extensive extrapolations are, I think, tricky.

Who ever said conservatives weren’t compassionate?

Bennett’s statement, which he now says was hypothetical (or, to use his own language, “a thought experiment about public policy”), is so clear, and so forthright, that it needs no parsing.

That, at least, is what I thought when I first read it. But I see that my new friends on The Corner would disagree with me — Jonah Goldberg calls this “a silly, manufactured, attack on Bennett. Maybe he could have phrased it differently, but the point he made is rational . . .”

Of course, the rationality of the point depends on what your definition of “rational” is. Personally, I don’t think that conducting involuntary mass abortions on the basis of race is a very rational solution to the problem of crime in this country, but what do I know — I’m just one of those kooky bloggers, not a former U.S. Secretary of Education with a nationally syndicated radio show and a “philosophy professor’s hat.”

At any rate, though the import of Bennett’s words are clear to most of us, the spin he uncorked after a controversy broke out is a little bit harder to follow.

In fact, it is so convoluted that it has sparked the return of the hottest craze sweeping the nation. Yes, my friends, I speak of Parse This!™, an exciting game of literary exegesis in which contestants attempt to unpack the opaque utterances of public figures.

Now, before I reveal today’s quote, allow me to set the stage: Bill Bennett has just been accused of uttering bizarre and racist statements. The President’s spokesperson has said that George W. Bush “believes the comments were not appropriate.” But Fox News gives Bennett a chance to appear on Hannity and Colmes in order to explain himself and put his words “in context.”

And this is what he said:

Well, the context was a radio show that I was doing yesterday, and the topic was abortion and we were talking about bad arguments in regard to abortion. A caller suggested he was opposed to abortion because he said if there were more babies there would be, eventually, more tax payers and a larger GNP, a smaller deficit. I said you want to be careful with that kind of argument because someone could postulate a situation where child’s not likely to be a productive taxpayer. I said, arguments in which you take something that’s far out, like the GNP and try to connect it up with abortion are tricky. I said make the case of abortion on the basis of life and protecting life. I said abortion is invoked in another way; you could make an argument that if you wanted to lower the crime rate, you saw the quote; you could practice abortion in very large numbers. You could do it in the black community; you could do it in other places. This is, by the way, the subject of a book for economics by a professor at Yale.

I feel like Bennett is saying something here, but I have no idea what it is. Can you help out? Please, Parse This™!

07.11.05

Parse This: Scott McClellan

America loves a good game of cat and mouse. The tradition is long and storied: Tom and Jerry; Itchy and Scratchy; Ren and Stimpy; Sam and Diane; Nixon and The Washington Post.

That playful spirit and competitive desire is showcased in the hottest game sweeping the nation, Parse This!™, in which contestants attempt to decipher the opaque utterances of public figures.

In today’s edition, we confront the words of a man who often plays cat and mouse with the members of the White House Press corps. In fact, his very job depends on his ability to confound others with his verbal stews, his skill at cooking hard and pointy truths over low heat for so long that they fall right off the bone, becoming mushy globs of goo that can be swallowed easily by an infirm American public. He spins so hard and so fast that even he gets dizzy sometimes, and forgets that what he says is actually recorded, transcripted, and archived for the good of America’s children, that they might know, in the future, how their country fell apart in the first decade of the twenty-first century.

It looks like the Press is starting to figure it all out, but sometimes even they need a helping hand, a double super secret decoder ring, if you will.

And that’s where you, dear readers come in: it is my hope that you will succeed where others have failed, and that together, we will solve this mystery for once and for all.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you: Scott McClellan

So, without further ado, let’s put on our favorite parsing headgear and

Q Scott, if I could — if I could point out, contradictory to that statement, on September 29th, 2003, while the investigation was ongoing, you clearly commented on it. You were the first one who said, if anybody from the White House was involved, they would be fired. And then on June 10th of 2004, at Sea Island Plantation, in the midst of this investigation is when the President made his comment that, yes, he would fire anybody from the White House who was involved. So why have you commented on this during the process of the investigation in the past, but now you’ve suddenly drawn a curtain around it under the statement of, “We’re not going to comment on an ongoing investigation”?

MR. McCLELLAN: Again, John, I appreciate the question. I know you want to get to the bottom of this. No one wants to get to the bottom of it more than the President of the United States. And I think the way to be most helpful is to not get into commenting on it while it is an ongoing investigation. That’s something that the people overseeing the investigation have expressed a preference that we follow. And that’s why we’re continuing to follow that approach and that policy.

06.24.05

Parse This: Tom Cruise

Once again, it’s time to play America’s fastest-growing reading-comprehension game.

Today, we tackle the prose of an intellectual giant, a man whose knowledge knows no bounds, or boundaries. A man whose quick and toothy grin shrouds the mind of a scholar, the wit of a litterateur, and the instincts of a philosopher. In short, a genius of the super-celebrity kind.

So put on your parsing chapeau, and let’s

‘’You don’t know the history of psychiatry. I do.'’

– Tom Cruise to Matt Lauer, The Today Show, 6/24/05 (source)

06.21.05

Parse This: Going to Gitmo

Last week on The Tattered Coat, I unveiled a new category that asks readers to explore the hidden meanings of dubious public statements.

It’s called Parse This!™, and it’s the hot new craze that’s sweeping the nation!

In our inaugural edition, we explored the selected prose of boxer/philosopher Mike Tyson.

Today, through the good graces of All-Spin Zone, we’re ready for our second examination of the wild and wacky world of public locution.

So, without further ado, put your parsing cap on, and let’s

“I urge members of our press corps to go down to Guantanamo and see how they’re treated.”

President George W. Bush (6/20/05)

06.14.05

Parse This: Mike Tyson

Enough with the Michael Jackson already! Let’s talk about a subject we can really sink our teeth into: Mike Tyson.

A recent interview with Mike after his crushing loss to journeyman boxer Kevin McBride gives me the chance to introduce a new category to readers of The Tattered Coat, one that is sure to please our crack team of commenting (and cunning) linguists:

As a “Parse This” participant, your job is to tease out, from the offered quotation, the subtle shades of meaning that make it sublime.* Or, to put it another way, to explain to us what the hell it is really saying.

Because this is our first “Parse This” Event, I’m offering five Tyson quotes for the price of one. I should note that quote #3 led to the creation of this category, and most rewards close analysis. The others may be considered background (a few of them require no explication), but feel free to parse as many as you wish.

Ready? Here we go.

1. “I want to throw down your kid and stomp on his testicles, and then you will know what it is like to experience waking up everyday as me. And only then will you feel my pain.”

– Mike Tyson, undated

2. “I’m just a dark guy from a den of iniquity. A dark shadowy figure from the bowels of iniquity. I wish I could be Mike who gets an endorsement deal. But you can’t make a lie and a truth go together. This country wasn’t built on moral fiber. This country was built on rape, slavery, murder, degradation and affiliation with crime.”

– Mike Tyson, undated

3. “This is a weird feeling in my life I have to deal with, not being a violent man anymore when my whole life’s reputation was built on being extremely violent. I just don’t know how to deal with that right now. I don’t even go to strip clubs no more. I don’t know who I am sometimes, but I am not the guy I used to be. I’m not an angel or anything. I’m still lascivious, periodically. I’m just looking for some balance in my life.”

– Mike Tyson, June 11, 2005

4. “You’re smart too late and old too soon. I just got caught up in that suction cup. I feel like Rip Van Winkle right now.”

– Mike Tyson, June 11, 2005

5. “I guess I’m gonna fade into Bolivian.”

– Mike Tyson, undated

* For the purposes of this Event, we will take our definition of the Sublime from the Grove Online Dictionary of Art, which defines it (in part) as that which is “vast, irregular, [and] obscure.”



philly ad network logo
Liberal Prose Ad Network logo