Harriet Miers

10.27.05

Harriet Miers Withdraws

Harriet Miers has withdrawn her nomination to be the next justice on the Supreme Court.

And now the battle truly begins.

Forced by the radical wing of his party to nominate a justice who passes the supposedly nonexistent conservative litmus test, and having to do so at a time when he desperately needs to shore up the support of his own party, Bush will undoubtedly pick someone whose right-wing views are beyond reproach.

And then it will be up to Democrats to fight the nomination.

Suffice it to say that after the Roberts hearings, my confidence in their ability to do that successfully is less than absolute.

But we shall see. Let’s hope that the Gang of 14 lives up to its bipartisan posse status, and prevents the next nominee from being a ranting ideologue on the order of Antonin Scalia.

UPDATE: Harriet weighs in (via Attytood)

UPDATE #2: Great post by Ezra Klein (who quotes another great post by Mark Schmitt) on the changed dynamics in the Senate, and especially about Arlen Specter’s role in approving the next nomination.

Schmitt writes:

If all they had to do was satisfy the hard right, they could probably do it, especially if they don’t worry about the nominee being female or Hispanic. But there is another factor they have to deal with now: Arlen Specter. A year ago, Specter was humbled and compliant. Bush and Santorum had saved his Senate seat from a right-wing primary challenge, and Bush had protected him when there were right-wing objections to his taking the Judiciary Committee chairmanship. But now the politics are very different. What’s the right going to do to him now? What’s Bill Frist going to do to either protect him or hurt him? Nothing. What good is the protection of a humbled White House? And knowing a little bit about Specter, I’m guessing that he feels highly insulted by the fact of the Miers nomination and that he was expected to push it through. An angry, empowered Specter is not a pretty sight, and my guess will be that if they send up a hard-right movement conservative, especially on choice, Specter will no longer feel any obligation to do anything to move the nomination forward. It’s going to be much harder to satisfy both the angry right and the angry moderate than it would have been a month ago to just nominate one of the plausible candidates.

Ezra Klein adds that “In addition to a weakened White House, Frist has completely lost control and the Senate has devolved into fractious warfare between a variety of powerbases looking towards campaigns for the presidency. It is, for party discipline purposes, the absolute worst of all worlds.”

Let’s hope that they’re both right.

10.12.05

I’m Just Wild About Harry!

UPDATE 12:43 PM PST — This keeps getting more interesting. According to President Bush, the Miers nomination all comes down to the Jesus factor. Did God tell Bush to choose Miers like God told Bush to invade Iraq?

. . .

Some lefty bloggers seem excited, even giddy, that Bush’s nominee for the Supreme Court is being attacked by the Right. Some pundits speculate that Bush might give in to the conservative calls for him to withdraw her nomination. My take on all this madness is simple: Never underestimate the power of the dark side. To put it bluntly, the conservative knee jerk reaction to the Miers nomination is nothing but a Rovian mindf*%k.

About half of conservatives appear strongly vocal about Miers lack of qualifications. The other half remain silent and are blessed with the gift of blind faith. Yesterday, the Heretik summarized the latest hubbub about Miers’ nomination. Demented blonde fembots Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham have dared to spit in the face of Dear Leader by denouncing Miers and charging Bush with cronyism. Their fake-out games in the media are working quite well.

So, what about that secret phone call between Karl Rove and James Dobson? Rove went directly to the spokesman of the Christian dominionist movement to reassure them of Miers’ staunch conservative credentials. Here’s Sponge Dob on Miers (from Newsday):

“It’s what we all know now, that Harriet Miers is an evangelical Christian, that she is from a very conservative church, which is almost universally pro-life, that she had taken on the American Bar Association on the issue of abortion and fought for a policy that would not be supportive of abortion, that she had been a member of the Texas Right to Life.”

Bingo! Don’t tell me that George W. Bush would appoint a Souter to the court. There’s no chance in hell. Miers will turn out to be just what the Right desires and will perform a two-fold function for the ruling establishment. First, she will champion the conservative movement by voting to repeal women’s rights, workers’ rights and environmental protection. Second, she will defend the executive power of the “best governor ever” and bail him out of trouble if he ever faces prosecution once he leaves office.

Am I the only one who thinks the Right is trying to fake out the Left with their faux rage against Bush? Then again, I’m just a young, cynical exiled blogger who doesn’t know much. Time will tell.

Agi T. Prop

10.11.05

Miers: Lost in Translation

Bush_lost_in_translation_101105

THE RIGHT’S COOL RESPONSE to George Bush’s nomination of Harriet Miers’s to the Supreme Court won’t get any warmer with disclosure of key documents the NY Times got its recently Judith Miller sullied paws on [story]. The paper trail on My Little Crony Miers is so short, personal notes and cards are now submitted as evidence of a closer personal relationship than Bush would suggest for this remarkable and accomplished, totally exceptional woman. Cool!

In October 1997, Ms. Miers sent Mr. Bush a flowery greeting card in thanks for a letter that he had written on her behalf. In it, she said of his daughters: “Hopefully Jenna and Barbara recognize that their parents are ‘cool’ - as do the rest of us.”

THE TWINS JENNA AND BARBARA were not available for comment. The Right’s comments grow increasingly more heated to the nominee who thinks Bush is cool. No version of Babel Fish exists that can translate Bush’s message for The Right to understand what Bush is doing here. The picture of Bush emerging will not fade soon and only more misunderstanding and disappointing reviews are on the way.

The Heretik

10.05.05

Have It Your Way

This is why I have stopped eating hamburgers.

The New York Times reports that the FDA has proposed new rules on animal feed:

The Food and Drug Administration proposed new rules yesterday to prevent the spread of mad cow disease by banning brains and spinal cords from older cows in all animal feed.

“What?!” you say, half-chewed nuggets of ground beef falling from your lips. “There are digested brains and spinal cords in my Big Mac?”

Well, yes. But wait — there’s more:

But the rules are not as strict as those the agency proposed last year and never adopted, and critics promptly denounced them as inadequate.

The new proposal still allows chickens, pigs and other noncattle animals to be fed material that some scientists consider potentially infectious, including the brains and spinal cords of young animals, and the eyes, tonsils, intestines and nerves of older ones.

Cows can potentially ingest that material because they can be given chicken feed and droppings swept up from the floors of poultry farms, scrapings from restaurant plates, and a calf milk replacement made from cow blood and fat. In the rules proposed in early 2004, poultry litter and plate waste would have been banned.

Eyes? Tonsils? Intestines? Nerves? Droppings? Put that on a bun and eat it — if you haven’t already.

None of this is news if you’ve read Eric Schlosser’s excellent Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal. In that book, Schlosser exposes everything you never wanted to know about the fast food industry, and were afraid to ask.

A constant theme running throughout Schlosser’s book is that the fast food industry and its Washington lobbyists have succeeded in gutting or removing many safety regulations in the United States.

If you’re wondering who, in their right mind, would sanction the feeding of animal brains, guts, and turds to animals whose stomachs were made to digest grass, or why they would want to do so, the Times article provides the answer:

Getting rid of the vertebrae, spines, spinal nerves, eyes, intestines and other potentially infectious parts of all cattle - including the meat that nerves remain attached to - would create more than two billion pounds of waste, which he said would be an environmental problem and a big expense for the industry.

[snip]

A slaughterhouse can split a fresh carcass and vacuum out the soft brain and spinal cord, he said, but renderers pick up animals that are bloated or in rigor mortis. The extra costs of removing organs “may take away the economic incentive,” he said, “and carcasses will be disposed of illegally.”

It’s all about the profit margin. Never mind the health of the American consumer. And never mind accountability — since Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (the human form of mad cow disease) can have an incubation period of up to thirty years, none of the people making these decisions will have to face the consequences of their actions. Instead, like the massive national debt that Bush has piled up, this burden will fall on our children, and our children’s children.

Deregulation has long been a central platform of the Republican party — conservatives argue that private industry suffers when the government imposes rules upon it. But the FDA’s latest attempt to regulate the meatpacking industry in the face of a potential public health crisis reminds us that, left to themselves, businesses will always take the easiest path, regardless of the human consequences.

If you’re surprised by the current Bush administration’s blatant cronyism, and tendency to put the fox in charge of the henhouse, you shouldn’t be — as Schlosser notes, it’s a longstanding Republican practice:

During the 1980s, as the risks of widespread contamination increased, the meatpacking industry blocked the use of microbial testing the federal meat inspection program.

[snip]

Nevertheless, the Reagan and Bush administrations cut spending on public health measures and staffed the U.S. Department of Agriculture with officials far more interested in government deregulation than in food safety. The USDA became largely indistinguishable from the industries it was meant to police. President Reagan’s first secretary of agriculture was in the hog business. His second was the president of the American Meat Institute (formerly known as the American Meat Packers Association). And his choice to run the USDA’s Food Marketing and Inspection Service was a vice president of the National Cattleman’s Association. President Bush later appointed the president of the National Cattleman’s Association to the job.

The more things change, the more they stay the same. What most unites George W. Bush’s two Supreme Court nominees are their connections to corporations — John Roberts’ long list of corporate clients included the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, and The Dallas Morning News calls Harriet Miers “the quintessential corporate lawyer.”

Like FloridaExGOP, I think the underlying message of both nominations is “It’s corporate rights, stupid.”

If these two nominees turn out to be Bush’s most longstanding legacy, we can look forward to a continued agenda of corporate deregulation.

And if I ever return to Burger King, which encourages customers to “Have it Your Way,” I’ll be sure to ask them to hold the tonsils and eyeballs.

10.04.05

Two Hearts Beat as One

What song lyrics best suit this pair of cosy love-birds?

Here’s my vote:

I got chills, they’re multiplyin’, and I’m losin’ control
Cause the power you’re supplyin’, it’s electrifyin’

You better shape up, cause I need a man, and my heart is set on you
You better shape up, you better understand, to my heart I must be true
Nothing left, nothing left for me to do

You’re the one that I want (you are the one I want), ooh ooh ooh, honey
The one that I want (you are the one I want), ooh ooh ooh, honey

10.03.05

Separated at Birth? Harriet Miers and Ozzy Osbourne

My friend Rod emailed to point out that I may have been overly hasty in suggesting that Bush nominated Iggy Pop for the Supreme Court.

Upon further review, Bush clearly nominated Ozzy.

10.03.05

Bush Nominates Iggy Pop for Supreme Court

In a move that shocked the nation, George W. Bush has nominated Iggy Pop for Supreme Court justice.

Attytood has more on this nominee’s attempts to search and destroy.



philly ad network logo
Liberal Prose Ad Network logo