- The Tattered Coat - http://www.tatteredcoat.com -

Judge Orders Abu Ghraib Photos Released

Posted By Matt On 29th September 2005 @ 17:12 In Politics, War in Iraq, Abu Ghraib, Torture, War | 5 Comments

The AP reports that a U.S. District Judge has ordered the release of photos taken at Abu Ghraib that the military tried desperately to withhold on the grounds that releasing them could aid al-Queda recruitment.

The judge opined that terrorists have proven that they “do not need pretexts for their barbarism.” He also said that “My task is not to defer to our worst fears, but to interpret and apply the law, in this case, the Freedom of Information Act, which advances values important to our society, transparency and accountability in government.”

The article refers only to photographs; I don’t know whether the videos will be released as well.

Daily Kos has a partial transcription of a July speech by New Yorker journalist Seymour Hersh, who described some of the immensely disturbing photos and videos that he has seen (a video of Hersh’s speech can be found here; it starts at 1:07):

Some of the worst that happened that you don’t know about, ok. Videos, there are women there. Some of you may have read they were passing letters, communications out to their men. This is at Abu Ghraib which is 30 miles from Baghdad […]

The women were passing messages saying “Please come and kill me, because of what’s happened”. Basically what happened is that those women who were arrested with young boys/children in cases that have been recorded. The boys were sodomized with the cameras rolling. The worst about all of them is the soundtrack of the boys shrieking that your government has. They are in total terror it’s going to come out.

It’s impossible [not] to say to yourself how [did] we get there? who are we? Who are these people that sent us there?

Get ready for a shitstorm of major proportions.

Just as I thought that it was important for Americans to look at photographs of the New Orleans dead, I think it is imperative that our nation take a sober look at this material, no matter how disturbing it is. After all, the abuse was done in our name.

And as a nation, we must be willing to come to terms with the fact that the deranged abuse at Abu Ghraib was not simply the product of a few “bad apples,” but rather was the direct result of the decision, made by those at the highest pinnacles of U.S. power, to abandon the Geneva conventions for detainees in this war — a decision that ultimately puts our troops in the gravest possible danger.

At her trial, the lawyers for Lyndie England were not allowed to present evidence that her actions were the result of systemic problems in the military chain of command:

Late Monday, [Judge] Pohl rejected a request by Crisp to allow testimony during the sentencing phase by an Army captain who has reported similar prisoner abuse by other U.S. soldiers at a camp near Fallujah around the same time as the Abu Ghraib incidents.

Crisp said testimony by Capt. Ian Fishback would provide evidence of a command breakdown in Iraq that might have led England and other soldiers to think detainee mistreatment was condoned by military leaders.

But the judge ruled that he saw no proof that the two abuse situations were related, or that abuse elsewhere would in any way lessen the blame England might deserve for Abu Ghraib.

Her lawyers were forced instead to argue that England had “an overly compliant personality.”

The open question is how compliant the U.S. public will be as the Administration attempts to pin this outrage on grunts at the bottom of the chain-of-command.

As Reed Brody, special counsel for The Human Rights Watch, has argued, there is only one way for our nation to absolve itself:

“If the United States is to wipe away the stain of Abu Ghraib, it needs to investigate those at the top who ordered or condoned abuse and come clean on what the president has authorized,” said Brody. “Washington must repudiate, once and for all, the mistreatment of detainees in the name of the war on terror.”

5 Comments To "Judge Orders Abu Ghraib Photos Released"

#1 Comment By Neil Shakespeare On 29th September 2005 @ 17:54

Here’s hoping that they do finally come out and the Bushsters don’t have another censorship scheme. We do need to confront this. Same with the “war porn” photos. Interesting that AMERICAblog took a poll of its readers and asked if, since the gov’t was whitewashing this as well, they should force the “warporn” issue by posting these photos on their blog. The overwhelming response was “NO”. Even the readers of AMERICAblog didn’t want to be confronted with them. So don’t hold out much hope for middle America.

#2 Trackback By The Theroxylandr in Flame On 29th September 2005 @ 18:25

The ostrich defense

As the judge ordered the release of torture photos from Abu Ghraib, some conservatives voiced the opinion that this will help recruiting terrorists. Hardly, as violence is so common on the Middle East and their mind on US is made up anyway. Instead, t…

#3 Comment By The Heretik On 29th September 2005 @ 18:32

Nicely done

#4 Pingback By The Theroxylandr in Flame » The ostrich defense On 30th September 2005 @ 08:14

[…] And there are bold hints to suggest that the policy of torture was common. So why the buzz about images? Most of the times words don’t disturb, because imagination is not based on much of understanding of what the word torture really means. Look at this link. […]

#5 Comment By Mawaheb On 10th April 2006 @ 17:31

First of ALL I AM ARABIC
but never minde
oh america under the title of freedom
the CHILDREN are beeing killed why
becaus they want a little beace of bred ‘””’
i think that american officers are blode trade man


Article printed from The Tattered Coat: http://www.tatteredcoat.com

URL to article: http://www.tatteredcoat.com/archives/2005/09/29/judge-orders-withheld-abu-ghraib-photos-released/

Click here to print.