But you don’t know what it is
Do you, Mister Jones?
– Bob Dylan, “Ballad of a Thin Man”
This month’s issue of Philadelphia magazine contains an ill-begotten screed by Noel Weyrich that slanders my friend and fellow Philly blogger Richard Cranium. Weyrich accuses Richard of race-baiting and using the Latoyia Figueroa case to garner publicity for himself and for his blog:
As Richard points out in his incisive rebuttal, every one of Weyrich’s points is dead wrong:
On countless occasions, I was asked about the racial issues involved in the coverage. On equally countless occasions, I said that no one could ignore the race / lifestyle / socioeconomic aspects of the story - they were out there then; they are still out there. New Orleans is my witness.
Weyrich must live in some alternate bourgeois universe (which, perhaps, is Philadelphia Magazine’s geographic target) to not see the issues…
[snip]
[When Latoyia disappeared,] no one but Latoyia’s family seemed to care. After 8 days of her being missing, and virtually no media notice (while Natalee Holloway was 24X7 on cable news, apparently with some “lifestyle issues” of her own), I got pissed and blogged about it. So fucking sue me, already. Where were you, Noel?
To suggest that those of us who promoted Latoyia’s case did so for fame or fortune is beyond cynical — it is, quite frankly, sick.
In a missing-person case, every bit of additional publicity brought to the case is helpful. The goal is to get the face of the missing person in front of as many eyeballs as possible, with the slim hope that somehow, somewhere, it will spark a glimmer of recognition. When Richard saw that Latoyia’s case was being ignored by local and national media a week after she had been reported missing, he took action. Anyone who derides him for that needs to take a long look into his or her conscience, provided he or she has one.
I can attest to Richard’s reluctance to speak to the press about the case once it had received widespread notice. He turned down request after request from the national media. At one point, he sent an email to me and a few other bloggers, asking whether any of us wanted to appear on an episode of the Tucker Carlson show, because he would not do it. All Spin Zone’s SpinDentist decided to appear on that show, and it’s a good thing he did — he was able to counter Carlson’s rants, which seem similar to Weyrich’s attacks.
But Richard was still part of the story, whether he liked it or not, because his actions had been the prime reason why this case received national attention. And for that, he deserves praise, not condemnation.
It’s telling that Weyrich repeats, in toned-down form, some of the most racist accusations about Latoyia and her family that we in the Philly blogosphere heard when we posted about her. Compare this statement from Weyrich:
[snip]
Laci’s story was Hollywood. LaToyia’s story — unmarried, scratching out a living, knocked up by some lowlife probationer — isn’t.
with this racist drivel — written by “Mike” as a comment to this post of mine:
Kind of makes you wonder whether “Mike” was a nom-de-plume.
Weyrich is most emphatically and blatantly wrong in his contention that the attention bloggers brought to Latoyia’s case did not help solve it. The mainstream media attention brought increased scrutiny to the search for Latoyia — when the Philadelphia police department is questioned by CNN about a case, it takes notice. And it puts more officers on the case.
As Richard writes:
I, too, am proud to have played a very small part of a much larger effort to resolve Latoyia’s case. I challenge Weyrich to stand face to face with Latoyia’s dad or Coucilman Juan Ramos, as I did, and explain some of the assertions and implications in the article regarding Latoyia.
I’m proud to have helped, along with many other Philly and national bloggers, to bring attention to Latoyia’s case. I’m even prouder to count a man like Richard as a friend.
As for living in a city that shares its name with a glossy rag willing to print this racist slander, well, today I’m not too proud of that.

Other bloggers covering this story: Atrios, Will Bunch, Philly Future, Terrance Ryan, Above Average Jane, Philebrity, Steve Gilliard, Sisyphus Shrugged, and The Disenchanted Forest.




6 Comments on "Ballad of a Thin Man"
Pepper:
Good work.
The one difference between Mike and Noel is that Mike had an unusual obsession with fried-fish platters. He mentioned them several times on my blog.
Didn’t anyone teach Noel that the first sign of a weak argument is an ad hominem attack?
I mean, I throw veritable ad hominem parties, but I’m just a small-fish blogger - Noel is a paid writer, and shame on him/her.
Jane:
Hi, Can I be on the list, too? I picked up the mag and posted about it Sunday night.
http://aboveavgjane.blogspot.com/2005/09/philly-mag-disses-bloggers.html
Jane:
Thank you!!!!!
Grace Nearing:
Wow — Weyrich created a journalistic black hole, ie, a supra-concentration of bullsh*t. In five sentences we get a denial of the role of corporate racism in the lack of coverage, a corporate denial of the role of societal racism in the lack of coverage, an attack against bloggers and blogging in general, and the fallback accusation of our celebrity-driven times: those bloggers involved were only seeking personal fame(!) and fortune(!). It’s interesting that this last item is almost always a case of projection on the part of the accuser.
As you point out, the only paid professional involved is Weyrich. And what that says I find really, really disturbing.
somegirl:
right on matt! excellent summary of the whole issue.
weyrich’s take on this story truly is sick.
proud to count you and rc as friends too.
The Disenchanted Forest:
Philly Rag writer perfects the cranio-anal inversi
I don’t read Philadelphia Magazine, and I’m guessing the reason it hasn’t held my interest since high school is due to tripe like Noel Weyrich’s ill-informed attack on the Richard Cranium’s creation of a blogstorm about the coverage of LaToyia Fig…
Comments