12.13.04

The Big Hit

Ever since my wife and I got rid of cable, I’ve had to do without ESPN and Comedy Central (the only two basic-cable channels I really miss). Thanks to corporate synergy, however, I got a chance to watch the Eagles–Redskins game on ESPN last night–I live in Philly, where ESPN’s “Sunday Night Football” was shown on the local ABC affiliate.

The first thing I noticed as I watched the broadcast is that the announcers seemed to be obsessed with big hits. They talked, over and over, about this big hit or that flattening tackle, and accompanied their rhapsodies over such violent hits with replay after replay of one player smashing another. They broke the hits down in slow motion, dissecting each tackle with voyeuristic excitement –”look at that,” one announcer said, “his body went parallel to the ground!”

Now, I appreciate a big hit as much as anyone, but as the game wore on, it became clear to me that this game was no more violent than any other NFL game out there. The emphasis on big hits was so obvious, and so repetitive–and so out of line with NFL broadcasts on CBS or FOX–that the producers must have told the announcers to emphasize the big hits in order build up the drama and keep people interested–after all, people watching a sunday night game have presumably sat through 6 hours of football earlier in the day. ESPN’s football coverage was the equivalent of its SportsCenter highlights of basketball games, which emphasize slam dunks at the expense of any other kind of scoring play. In the corporate mindset, Big Hits = Good Highlights = Good Ratings.

But the chickens finally came home to roost in the fourth quarter, when Eagles fullback Josh Parry knocked Redskins cornerback Shaun Springs out cold. Springs lay motionless on the ground for several minutes.

As the medical crew rushed out to examine him, the BS began flow.

Faced with the inevitable result of their orgiastic celebration of violence on the field, the announcers were reduced to looking for positive signs where few positive signs could be found. After they came back from their first commercial break, they told us that they had “some good news to report,” which turned out to be that they had seen Springs move his legs a little bit. Great. Maybe he’ll be able to wiggle his toes from his wheelchair in the future.

And then the announcing team–Mike Patrick, Joe Theismann and Paul Maguire–proceeded to tell us that “you never want to see someone get hurt like this” as they showed the replay of the devastating hit from multiple angles.

Look, I love football as much as anyone, and violence is a central part of the sport. But if you celebrate the violence without thinking about the effect that it has on the “performers,” you’re acting in an irresponsible way, especially if you’re doing that celebrating from the control booth.

What really bothers me is that the result of ESPN’s concentration on “big hits” will be that players will try to deliver bigger and bigger hits during the game, in the same way that basketball players have tried to compose ever-more complicated slam dunks as a way to get into a SportsCenter highlight. And when you have players concentrating on big hits instead of on the game, you’re going to start seeing them carted off of the field on stretchers more frequently.

When you consider the fact that the contracts of NFL players are not guaranteed–and thus, teams can cancel player contracts without compensation if a player gets injured–ESPN’s football coverage seems to rise to the height of irresponsibility.

But hey, at least the ratings were good…BOOYAH!

2 Comments on "The Big Hit"


Ed Rendell:

I agree with your comments about the ESPN boradcasters. They’re horrible. Theisman openly roots for the Redskins, Maguire is the least repsected commentator among fans in the league and I couldn’t even tell you the other guy’s name but he sucks too so who cares. The point is, they beat everything to death, yell the loudest, and promote the game like a NASCAR race, big hits (crashes) are ratings. Sportscenter glory hitting also promotes bad tackling. How many times have you seen a guy fly right past the guy with the ball, trying to lay him out, when all he needed to do was just tackle him? No glory to the sportscenter masses, but you make the play, your team does better. I really think that is the worst result of the big hit mentality. It drives me absolutely crazy.

I don’t have a problem so much with the violence, i look at it like this… Within the rules of the game, there’s really not much worse that can happen to a player as we saw in this game. that guy got flat out fucked up. Sure, guys have broken legs, hips, noses, knees, backs and been paralyzed, but these injuries are unavoidable in football. Too many gigantic people moving too fast, it’s inevitible. The hit remined me of a killer hockey hit, like when Scott Stevens dropped the hammer on Eric Lindros in the 7th game of the conference finals. That was the end of a career, not just a hit. It was totally devastating and I really think that hockey, at times, is much more brutal than football. Those 10 ton hits happen alot in hockey, not as often in football, and the eagles definitely don’t skate (except for “lost in the lights” pinkston).


Matt:

Thanks for the post, “Ed.” I agree with almost everything you wrote. I think I remember hearing Theisman say “we” or “us” when talking about the Redskins at one point during the game.

Your take on the toll the big hits take on the game (players missing tackles because they’re going for huge hits), is right on, though I wonder how you feel about the contract issue I brought up. The more I watch sports, the more I think that contracts determine almost everything about a sport. In football, one of the most violent sports, you have unguaranteed contracts and a hard salary cap. The league has a great deal of parity, which everyone loves, but I think that the unguaranteed contracts are just devastating to the players, especially considering the toll the game takes on their bodies.

Of course, then you have basketball, where long-term, guaranteed contracts drive teams into corners they can’t get out of (see the Sixers and the Knicks, for two recent examples), and where expiring contracts become commodities in themselves–I remember that a year or two ago in the NBA, everyone wanted Hakeem Olajuwon’s contract, even though he had retired a few years earlier. The same thing happened with Terrell Brandon; and, of course, here in Philly, you had the legendary Matt Geiger….

I guess that what bothers me, in the end, is not so much the violence itself–I do like to watch football, hockey, and boxing–but rather, the way in which the ESPN juggernaut warps the fabric of the game. And the hypocrisy of the announcers just drives me crazy.

Having said that, I have to agree with you that Todd Pinkston is a pussy (sorry, there’s no other word for him!)


Comments





Comment Feed (RSS 2.0)
If your comments do not appear immediately, they may have been eaten by the spam filter. I can recover them if you let me know about it.

You do not have to be logged in to comment, but registering will ensure that your comments get past the spam filter.







philly ad network logo
Liberal Prose Ad Network logo